|
Post by abbylyons on Jun 23, 2013 16:22:09 GMT
The Shaper’s art is an inaccurate, mythical description of the past. However, those who are aware of the discrepancy between Hrothgar’s aggressive and ruthless military conquests and the harmonious, civilized rule depicted in the song nonetheless find the story powerful: "I listened, felt myself swept up. I knew very well that all he said was ridiculous…. My heart was light with Hrothgar’s goodness…. Thanes… spilled out over the surrounding hill, smiling, peaceable, hearing the harper as if not a man in all that lot had ever twisted a knife in his neighbor’s chest. ‘Well then he’s changed them,’ I said" (48).
The Shaper inspires his audience by creating a compelling vision of the people they want to believe they are, and sets high standards of morality and achievement that they will aspire to as they make choices in the future. A life dedicated to the prosperity and growth of the society the Shaper describes can be a life full of meaning, unlike Grendel’s empty and miserable life.
Do you agree that artists should take liberty with the past? If so, where should they draw the line? For example, it would clearly be unacceptable to create a mythical paean about the Nazi society that Hitler and his henchmen tried to create.
|
|
|
Post by travistoal on Jun 24, 2013 8:43:35 GMT
There's certainly a difference between how all of the different characters perceive and retell events, and how it defines the character, both objectively and in the eyes of the other viewers. For example, when Grendel tries to present the beauty of the juxtaposed life and death, the reader can see that the moment clearly shows Grendel's capacity to express creativity and love. However, in his haste and passion, he blows open a door and scares the Thanes. The Thanes tell a different story, and use the same setting to shine Grendel in a negative light. Due to his long life, Grendel has seen the rise and fall of many kings. Because of this, he has seen the terrible atrocities committed by man, and although the music stuns him, he is conflicted about the inaccuracy of the stories. This can be seen at an extreme level when Grendel meets the dragon who knows both past and future. The dragon seems to be jaded by this knowledge. Not physically -- he still is very active. He is jaded in the sense that he doesn't have the will to stop these terrible things from happening. He knows of deaths that will occur, he even gets meta when he references that Hrothgar's age will later be referred to as the 'Dark Ages,' but he doesn't even attempt to change what will happen. After all of his years, he does not even dignify the concept of thinking differently about events. This relationship implies that the longer a being lives, the less liberty they take with modifying the past. This would imply that the more mature beings, with the all-seeing dragon as the epitome of maturity, respect the events that occurred and as such don't change them later. Although it might suit the Shaper to spin a tale of intrigue, the older beings know that the real value of memories comes from their stability. Men should not take liberty with the past. However, if you're an artist trying to make a quick buck, you should take EXTREME liberty and make radically awesome stories. No line.
|
|